skip to primary navigation skip to content
 

 

You are not currently logged in

SPRI library catalogue

View a record

Please note: You are viewing the legacy database of the Scott Polar Research Institute Library catalogue. It is no longer being updated, so does not reliably reflect our current library holdings.

Please search for material in iDiscover for up-to-date information about the library collection.


Record #179598:

Review of the Southern Ocean sanctuary: marine protected areas in the context of the International Whaling Commission sanctuary programme / Mark A. Zacharias, Leah R. Gerber, K. David Hyrenbach.

Title: Review of the Southern Ocean sanctuary: marine protected areas in the context of the International Whaling Commission sanctuary programme / Mark A. Zacharias, Leah R. Gerber, K. David Hyrenbach.
Author(s): Zacharias, Mark A.
Gerber, Leah R.
Hyrenbach, K. David.
Date: 2006.
In: Journal of Cetacean Research and Management. (2006.), Vol. 8(1) (2006)
Abstract: Addresses questions related to effectiveness of Southern Ocean Sanctuary (SOS), and provides recommendations on how to incorporate Marine Protected Area concepts into SOS and IWC sanctuary programme. Argues that SOS is based on vague goals and objectives that are difficult to measure, lacks rigorous approach to design and operation, and has no effective monitoring framework for evaluation. providing false sense of security by assuming that broad protections for whale populations are in place. Though SOS restricts commercial harvests from low latitude feeding grounds occupied by large whales during austral summers, they do not protect against or mitigate other threats such as pollution, habitat degradation and loss, introduced species and global climate change. Recommends development of formally stated goals such as biodiversity protection and fisheries enhancement; establishment of measurable objectives with which to assess progress towards attaining these goals; creation of formal management plan, including establishment of monitoring framework; and development of more appropriate review criteria, reflecting ecological objectives of management plan.
Notes:

Journal of Cetacean Research and Management. Vol. 8(1) :1-12 (2006).

Keywords: 502 -- Environmental issues.
502.72 -- Wildlife reserves.
502.743 -- Conservation, animal species.
599.5 -- Cetacea.
639.2 -- Fisheries.
639.2.055 -- Fisheries restrictions and control.
639.245.1 -- Whaling industry.
338.98 -- Fisheries, regulation.
347.246 -- Game laws.
061(100) -- Organizations, international: International Whaling Commission (IWC).
F -- Biological sciences.
(*7) -- Antarctic regions.
(*80) -- Southern Ocean.
SPRI record no.: 179598

MARCXML

LDR 02598naa#a2200000#a#4500
001 SPRI-179598
005 20220928021414.0
007 ta
008 220928s2006####xx#ab#|##|###|0||#0|eng#d
035 ## ‡aSPRI-179598
040 ## ‡aUkCU-P‡beng‡eaacr
100 1# ‡aZacharias, Mark A.
245 10 ‡aReview of the Southern Ocean sanctuary :‡bmarine protected areas in the context of the International Whaling Commission sanctuary programme /‡cMark A. Zacharias, Leah R. Gerber, K. David Hyrenbach.
260 ## ‡a[S.l.] :‡b[s.n.],‡c2006.
300 ## ‡ap. 1-12 :‡bill., diags., maps.
500 ## ‡aJournal of Cetacean Research and Management. Vol. 8(1) :1-12 (2006).
520 3# ‡aAddresses questions related to effectiveness of Southern Ocean Sanctuary (SOS), and provides recommendations on how to incorporate Marine Protected Area concepts into SOS and IWC sanctuary programme. Argues that SOS is based on vague goals and objectives that are difficult to measure, lacks rigorous approach to design and operation, and has no effective monitoring framework for evaluation. providing false sense of security by assuming that broad protections for whale populations are in place. Though SOS restricts commercial harvests from low latitude feeding grounds occupied by large whales during austral summers, they do not protect against or mitigate other threats such as pollution, habitat degradation and loss, introduced species and global climate change. Recommends development of formally stated goals such as biodiversity protection and fisheries enhancement; establishment of measurable objectives with which to assess progress towards attaining these goals; creation of formal management plan, including establishment of monitoring framework; and development of more appropriate review criteria, reflecting ecological objectives of management plan.
650 07 ‡a502 -- Environmental issues.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a502.72 -- Wildlife reserves.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a502.743 -- Conservation, animal species.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a599.5 -- Cetacea.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a639.2 -- Fisheries.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a639.2.055 -- Fisheries restrictions and control.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a639.245.1 -- Whaling industry.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a338.98 -- Fisheries, regulation.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a347.246 -- Game laws.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a061(100) -- Organizations, international: International Whaling Commission (IWC).‡2udc
650 07 ‡aF -- Biological sciences.‡2local
651 #7 ‡a(*7) -- Antarctic regions.‡2udc
651 #7 ‡a(*80) -- Southern Ocean.‡2udc
700 1# ‡aGerber, Leah R.
700 1# ‡aHyrenbach, K. David.
773 0# ‡7nnas ‡tJournal of Cetacean Research and Management. ‡gVol. 8(1) (2006) ‡wSPRI-151863
916 ## ‡a2007/07/27 -- HS
917 ## ‡aUnenhanced record from Muscat, imported 2019
948 3# ‡a20220928 ‡bHS