skip to primary navigation skip to content
 

 

You are not currently logged in

SPRI library catalogue

View a record

Please note: You are viewing the legacy database of the Scott Polar Research Institute Library catalogue. It is no longer being updated, so does not reliably reflect our current library holdings.

Please search for material in iDiscover for up-to-date information about the library collection.


Record #177823:

The dirty four: the case against letting BP, Amoco, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Phillips Petroleum drill in the Arctic Refuge / Athan Manuel.

Title: The dirty four: the case against letting BP, Amoco, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Phillips Petroleum drill in the Arctic Refuge / Athan Manuel.
Author(s): Manuel, Athan.
Date: 2003.
Publisher: New York: Nova Science
In: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge : background and issues. (2003.),
Abstract: Examines track record of spills and pollution of four oil companies and argues that it refutes notion that drilling in Arctic Refuge would leave small "footprint". Notes that, were drilling to proceed, area of 12,500 acres of coastal plain would be directly affected by network of roads, drill pads, processing facilities and airports, as potential resources are located in many small accumulations, instead of in one large field (as at Prudhoe Bay),.
Notes:

In: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge : background and issues / Tatiana Shohov, ed.

Keywords: 502 -- Environmental issues.
502.4 -- Nature reserves.
504.05 -- Environmental damage.
504.054 -- Pollution.
665.6 -- Pollution, oil.
504.064.2 -- Environmental impact assessment.
574 -- Ecology.
622.32 -- Petroleum, extraction.
712.23 -- National parks: Alaska. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
F -- Biological sciences.
(*3) -- Arctic regions.
(*49) -- Alaska.
(*494) -- Alaska, northwestern.
SPRI record no.: 177823

MARCXML

LDR 01764naa#a2200000#a#4500
001 SPRI-177823
005 20221208003216.0
007 ta
008 221208s2003####nyu####|#####|0||#0#eng#d
035 ## ‡aSPRI-177823
040 ## ‡aUkCU-P‡beng‡eaacr
100 1# ‡aManuel, Athan.
245 14 ‡aThe dirty four :‡bthe case against letting BP, Amoco, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Phillips Petroleum drill in the Arctic Refuge /‡cAthan Manuel.
260 ## ‡aNew York :‡bNova Science,‡c2003.
300 ## ‡ap. 71-96.
500 ## ‡aIn: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge : background and issues / Tatiana Shohov, ed.
520 3# ‡aExamines track record of spills and pollution of four oil companies and argues that it refutes notion that drilling in Arctic Refuge would leave small "footprint". Notes that, were drilling to proceed, area of 12,500 acres of coastal plain would be directly affected by network of roads, drill pads, processing facilities and airports, as potential resources are located in many small accumulations, instead of in one large field (as at Prudhoe Bay),.
650 07 ‡a502 -- Environmental issues.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a502.4 -- Nature reserves.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a504.05 -- Environmental damage.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a504.054 -- Pollution.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a665.6 -- Pollution, oil.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a504.064.2 -- Environmental impact assessment.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a574 -- Ecology.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a622.32 -- Petroleum, extraction.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a712.23 -- National parks: Alaska. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.‡2udc
650 07 ‡aF -- Biological sciences.‡2local
651 #7 ‡a(*3) -- Arctic regions.‡2udc
651 #7 ‡a(*49) -- Alaska.‡2udc
651 #7 ‡a(*494) -- Alaska, northwestern.‡2udc
773 0# ‡7nnam ‡aTatiana Shohov, ed. ‡tArctic National Wildlife Refuge : background and issues. ‡dNew York : Nova Science, 2003. ‡wSPRI-176732
916 ## ‡aJW
917 ## ‡aUnenhanced record from Muscat, imported 2019
948 3# ‡a20221208 ‡bJW