skip to primary navigation skip to content
 

 

You are not currently logged in

SPRI library catalogue

View a record

Please note: You are viewing the legacy database of the Scott Polar Research Institute Library catalogue. It is no longer being updated, so does not reliably reflect our current library holdings.

Please search for material in iDiscover for up-to-date information about the library collection.


Record #170222:

Options for allocating the precautionary catch limit of krill among small-scale management units in the Scotia Sea / R.P. Hewitt, G. Watters, P.N. Trathan, J.P. Croxall, Micael E. Goebel, D. Ramm, K. Reid, W.Z. Trivelpiece, J.L. Watkins.

Title: Options for allocating the precautionary catch limit of krill among small-scale management units in the Scotia Sea / R.P. Hewitt, G. Watters, P.N. Trathan, J.P. Croxall, Micael E. Goebel, D. Ramm, K. Reid, W.Z. Trivelpiece, J.L. Watkins.
Author(s): Hewitt, R. P.
Watters, G.
Trathan, P. N.
Croxall, J. P.
Goebel, Micael E.
Ramm, D.
Reid, K.
Trivelpiece, W. Z.
Watkins, J. L.
Date: 2004.
In: CCAMLR Science. (2004.), Vol. 11 (2004)
Abstract: Evaluates five options for subdividing precautionary catch limit for krill in CCAMLR Area 48 among small-scale management units (SSMUs). Four options involve static allocations where allotment of catch to SSMU is proportional to either historical catch within SSMU; or estimated predator demand in SSMU; or estimated standing stock of krill in SSMU; or standing stock less predator demand in SSMU. Fifth option involves dynamic allocation based on land-based predator monitoring conducted just prior to, or early in, the fishing season. Under first two options substantial portion of catch limit would be allocated to SSMUs adjacent to large concentrations of land-breeding predators; under second two options similarly large portion of catch limit would be directed to pelagic SSMUs beyond foraging area of these predators but into areas where krill fishing has not regularly occurred. Under adjustable catch limit dependent on results of ecosystem monitoring exemplified by option five, fishery would be restricted in some of its traditional fishing grounds during years of low krill availability. Discusses possible future trade-off as catch increases between options that displace fishery from current operating area but reduce potential for contravening terms of Convention, and options that do not displace fishery but are likely to contravene terms of Convention.
Notes:

CCAMLR Science. Vol. 11 :81-97 (2004).

Keywords: 639.2 -- Fisheries.
639.2.001 -- Fisheries research.
639.2.055 -- Fisheries restrictions and control.
639.281.2 -- Krill industry.
595.383.1 -- Euphausiacea: Euphausia superba.
502.743 -- Conservation, animal species.
574.5 -- Marine and freshwater ecology.
574.523 -- Food chains and networks, aquatic.
.000(410) -- British author.
N -- Renewable resources.
(*7) -- Antarctic regions.
(*726) -- Maritime Antarctic.
(*80) -- Southern Ocean.
(*82) -- South Atlantic Ocean.
(*824) -- Scotia Sea.
SPRI record no.: 170222

MARCXML

LDR 02974naa#a2200000#a#4500
001 SPRI-170222
005 20240419082156.0
007 ta
008 240419s2004####xx#b##|##|###|0||#0|eng#d
035 ## ‡aSPRI-170222
040 ## ‡aUkCU-P‡beng‡eaacr
245 00 ‡aOptions for allocating the precautionary catch limit of krill among small-scale management units in the Scotia Sea /‡cR.P. Hewitt, G. Watters, P.N. Trathan, J.P. Croxall, Micael E. Goebel, D. Ramm, K. Reid, W.Z. Trivelpiece, J.L. Watkins.
260 ## ‡a[S.l.] :‡b[s.n.],‡c2004.
300 ## ‡ap. 81-97 :‡btables, map.
500 ## ‡aCCAMLR Science. Vol. 11 :81-97 (2004).
520 3# ‡aEvaluates five options for subdividing precautionary catch limit for krill in CCAMLR Area 48 among small-scale management units (SSMUs). Four options involve static allocations where allotment of catch to SSMU is proportional to either historical catch within SSMU; or estimated predator demand in SSMU; or estimated standing stock of krill in SSMU; or standing stock less predator demand in SSMU. Fifth option involves dynamic allocation based on land-based predator monitoring conducted just prior to, or early in, the fishing season. Under first two options substantial portion of catch limit would be allocated to SSMUs adjacent to large concentrations of land-breeding predators; under second two options similarly large portion of catch limit would be directed to pelagic SSMUs beyond foraging area of these predators but into areas where krill fishing has not regularly occurred. Under adjustable catch limit dependent on results of ecosystem monitoring exemplified by option five, fishery would be restricted in some of its traditional fishing grounds during years of low krill availability. Discusses possible future trade-off as catch increases between options that displace fishery from current operating area but reduce potential for contravening terms of Convention, and options that do not displace fishery but are likely to contravene terms of Convention.
650 07 ‡a639.2 -- Fisheries.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a639.2.001 -- Fisheries research.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a639.2.055 -- Fisheries restrictions and control.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a639.281.2 -- Krill industry.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a595.383.1 -- Euphausiacea: Euphausia superba.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a502.743 -- Conservation, animal species.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a574.5 -- Marine and freshwater ecology.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a574.523 -- Food chains and networks, aquatic.‡2udc
650 07 ‡a.000(410) -- British author.‡2udc
650 07 ‡aN -- Renewable resources.‡2local
651 #7 ‡a(*7) -- Antarctic regions.‡2udc
651 #7 ‡a(*726) -- Maritime Antarctic.‡2udc
651 #7 ‡a(*80) -- Southern Ocean.‡2udc
651 #7 ‡a(*82) -- South Atlantic Ocean.‡2udc
651 #7 ‡a(*824) -- Scotia Sea.‡2udc
700 1# ‡aHewitt, R. P.
700 1# ‡aWatters, G.
700 1# ‡aTrathan, P. N.
700 1# ‡aCroxall, J. P.
700 1# ‡aGoebel, Micael E.
700 1# ‡aRamm, D.
700 1# ‡aReid, K.
700 1# ‡aTrivelpiece, W. Z.
700 1# ‡aWatkins, J. L.
773 0# ‡7nnas ‡tCCAMLR Science. ‡gVol. 11 (2004) ‡wSPRI-131147
916 ## ‡aHS
917 ## ‡aUnenhanced record from Muscat, imported 2019
948 3# ‡a20240419 ‡bHS