Scott Polar Research InstituteSPRI library catalogue
Search the catalogue
Browse recordsView a record
Please note: You are viewing the legacy database of the Scott Polar Research Institute Library catalogue. It is no longer being updated, so does not reliably reflect our current library holdings.
Please search for material in iDiscover for up-to-date information about the library collection.
Record #154465:
- #154465
Main publication details
MARC recordTraditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management / Peter J. Usher.
| Title: | Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management / Peter J. Usher. |
| Author(s): | Usher, Peter J. |
| Date: | 2000. |
| In: | Arctic. (2000.), Vol. 53(2) (2000) |
| Abstract: | Discusses problems involved in implementing policy requirement that TEK be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management given inconsistent and unclear definitions of TEK. Stresses importance of TEK being comprehensible and testable as knowledge claim in public reviews, and usable for ongoing public monitoring and co-management processes. To this end, makes recommendations for recording, organizing, and presenting TEK, with particular emphasis on need to differentiate between observations and inference or association. |
| Notes: | Arctic. Vol. 53(2) :183-193 (2000). |
| Keywords: | 63 -- Renewable resources. 504.062 -- Natural resources, conservation. 113/119 -- Attitudes to nature. N -- Renewable resources. (*3) -- Arctic regions. |
| SPRI record no.: | 154465 |
LDR 01302naa#a2200000#a#4500 001 SPRI-154465 005 20230924105631.0 007 ta 008 230924s2000####xx####|##|###|0||#0|eng#d 035 ## ‡aSPRI-154465 040 ## ‡aUkCU-P‡beng‡eaacr 100 1# ‡aUsher, Peter J. 245 10 ‡aTraditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management /‡cPeter J. Usher. 260 ## ‡a[S.l.] :‡b[s.n.],‡c2000. 300 ## ‡ap. 183-193. 500 ## ‡aArctic. Vol. 53(2) :183-193 (2000). 520 3# ‡aDiscusses problems involved in implementing policy requirement that TEK be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management given inconsistent and unclear definitions of TEK. Stresses importance of TEK being comprehensible and testable as knowledge claim in public reviews, and usable for ongoing public monitoring and co-management processes. To this end, makes recommendations for recording, organizing, and presenting TEK, with particular emphasis on need to differentiate between observations and inference or association. 650 07 ‡a63 -- Renewable resources.‡2udc 650 07 ‡a504.062 -- Natural resources, conservation.‡2udc 650 07 ‡a113/119 -- Attitudes to nature.‡2udc 650 07 ‡aN -- Renewable resources.‡2local 651 #7 ‡a(*3) -- Arctic regions.‡2udc 773 0# ‡7nnas ‡tArctic. ‡gVol. 53(2) (2000) ‡wSPRI-21029 917 ## ‡aUnenhanced record from Muscat, imported 2019 948 3# ‡a20230924